Author: Kartikey Mishra, Student at Amity University, Lucknow
Co-Author: Sandeep Mishra, Assistant Professor at Amity University, Lucknow
ABSTRACT
Corruption is a serious threat, supported by well-established facts and abundant physical evidence, that undermines national security and stability while also impeding socioeconomic and political progress. Its negative consequences extend beyond democratic and moral principles, contributing to the economic stagnation of developing countries such as India. Both internal and external factors impede infrastructure development, necessitating a rethinking of existing frameworks and increased transparency in public spending. Corruption pervades various sectors, causing ambitious projects to be delayed and taxpayers to incur significant financial losses.
In response, India’s Administrative Reforms Commission proposed the establishment of “Lokpal” and “Lokayukta” in 1966, as specialized agencies to address citizens’ concerns. Dr. LM Singvi introduced the Lokpal concept, which was later adopted by international countries such as Finland, Denmark, and Sweden. The Lokpal and Lokayukta Act of 2013 established statutory bodies to combat corruption at both the federal and state levels. This article examines the Lokayukta’s power and operations in India, critically evaluating the Act’s efficacy.
The research paper takes a mixed-methods approach, conducting a systematic literature review and analyzing the Act’s implementation. The assessment examines the powers and functions of the Lokpal and Lokayukta, with a particular emphasis on the judiciary’s role in shaping their effectiveness.
Keywords: Lokpal, Lokayukta, Power, Corruption, Independent Ombudsman, Politics, Judicial Contribution.
